tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26869571.post115981698312482928..comments2023-11-02T09:09:23.836-07:00Comments on Wrong Dog's Life Chest: Shane C. Masonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04784077864606821321noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26869571.post-1159937420678663222006-10-03T21:50:00.000-07:002006-10-03T21:50:00.000-07:00INDEED.....INDEED.....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26869571.post-1159845776810357482006-10-02T20:22:00.000-07:002006-10-02T20:22:00.000-07:00In my mind, it is OK to legislate actions that all...<I>In my mind, it is OK to legislate actions that allow one person to impede on anothers right to the pursuit of happiness or on ones safety.</I><BR/>Hmmm...<BR/><BR/>Have to chew on that one for a while.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26869571.post-1159843158432962632006-10-02T19:39:00.000-07:002006-10-02T19:39:00.000-07:00All legislation is legislating morality; it's just...<I>All legislation is legislating morality; it's just a question of whose.</I><BR/><BR/>Can I say that is cynacle? Seems so, in a way. I would say that you are right to an extent, but wrong in another. In my mind, it is OK to legislate actions that allow one person to impede on anothers right to the pursuit of happiness or on ones safety. For instance, saying 'Don't kill people' is positive because I can not pursue happiness when I am dead. <BR/><BR/>However, telling an adult that they can not smoke pot is not OK because the smoking of pot does not impede on anyone elses rights.Shane C. Masonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04784077864606821321noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26869571.post-1159838875525598932006-10-02T18:27:00.000-07:002006-10-02T18:27:00.000-07:00Pretty much what Rob said.I would add the followin...Pretty much what Rob said.<BR/><BR/>I would add the following maxim as food for thought, though: All legislation is legislating morality; it's just a question of whose.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com